azspot

Goldman Sachs is investing $450 million of its own money in Facebook, at a valuation that implies the social networking company is now worth $50 billion.  Goldman is also apparently launching a fund that will bring its own high net worth clients in as investors for Facebook.

On the face of it, this might just seem like the financial sector doing what it is supposed to – channeling funds into productive enterprise.  The SEC is apparently looking at the way private investors will be involved, but there are some more deeply unsettling factors at work here.

Remember that Goldman Sachs is now a bank holding company – a status it received in September 2008, at the height of the financial crisis, in order to avoid collapse (for the details, see Andrew Ross Sorkin’s blow-by-blow account in Too Big To Fail.)  This means that it has essentially unfettered access to the Federal Reserve’s discount window, i.e., it can borrow against all kinds of assets in its portfolio, effective ensuring it has government-provided liquidity at any time.

Any financial institution with such access to such government support is likely to take on excessive risk – this is the heart of what is commonly referred to as the problem of “moral hazard.”  If you are fully insured against adverse events, you will be less careful.

  1. nhmortgagebroker reblogged this from dihard
  2. silas216 reblogged this from azspot
  3. pdl2h reblogged this from azspot
  4. hairtrending reblogged this from azspot
  5. sallyherman reblogged this from dihard
  6. leftish said: I’ve been waiting, hoping, longing for Facebook’s replacement to appear already - wouldn’t it be awesome if Goldman lost all $ invested in Facebook, when it goes the way of MySpace? Oh wait, are you saying the taxpayers will suffer the most losses?
  7. dihard reblogged this from azspot
  8. azspot posted this